The five practices

Radical hospitality: what it means for a congregation, and what it does not

The five practices · Published 2026-10-27

A small white wooden church with a steeple and green roof under a blue sky with clouds, surrounded by grass
St. Catharine United Methodist Church in Linn County, Missouri, established 1890. Photo: Binx1966, CC0.

Almost every congregation describes itself as friendly. Visitors often see it differently. "Radical hospitality", the first of the five practices popularized by Robert Schnase's 2007 book Five Practices of Fruitful Congregations, is an attempt to close that gap: to move welcome from a pleasant atmosphere among people who already know one another to a deliberate, demanding habit aimed at people who do not yet belong.

Vine & Lintel is an independent publication. This explainer summarizes and discusses a public framework in our own words; it is not written by or for the author or publisher of the book.

What the phrase means

In the framework, hospitality is the practice by which a congregation invites, receives and cares for people who are not yet part of its life, and helps them find a place there. The adjective matters. "Radical" here does not mean politically extreme; it carries its older sense of going to the root. Hospitality at the root is not a program or a committee. It is a disposition of the whole community that asks, every week, who is missing and what it would take for them to come in and stay.

In an interview with the Lewis Center for Church Leadership the year the book appeared, Schnase said that this was the chapter readers responded to most strongly, and the adjectives in all five practice names were chosen to push congregations past comfortable habits toward a more costly kind of faithfulness. Hospitality was placed first for a practical reason: the other practices cannot take root in people who never arrive, or who arrive once and quietly do not return.

Roots in Scripture and tradition

The idea is far older than any church-growth book. The Hebrew Scriptures repeatedly command care for the stranger, grounded in Israel's own memory of being strangers in Egypt. Abraham and Sarah's welcome of three visitors at Mamre became a classic image of hospitality that turns out to be an encounter with God. In the Gospels, Jesus eats with people others keep at a distance, and the letter to the Hebrews urges readers not to neglect hospitality to strangers. The Rule of Saint Benedict, written in the sixth century, tells monks to receive every guest as Christ.

The Methodist movement that shaped Schnase's own denomination grew through small, accountable groups that gave newcomers a place to belong quickly. That history helps explain the emphasis: in this tradition, welcome is not merely courtesy but a means by which people are drawn into a life of grace.

What radical hospitality looks like in practice

Congregations that take this practice seriously tend to work on several fronts at once:

Common ways churches fall short

The most frequent failure is mistaking warmth among members for welcome to outsiders. A lively coffee hour in which every circle is already closed can feel colder to a visitor than an empty room. Other recurring problems include:

Some critics of church-growth thinking worry that "hospitality" can become a marketing technique aimed at filling seats. That risk is real, and the framework itself frames welcome as an expression of God's grace rather than an attendance strategy. A useful test is whether a congregation would still practise hospitality toward people who are unlikely ever to join, give or attend regularly.

Hospitality and the other four practices

Hospitality is an entry point, not a destination. Its fruit depends on what newcomers find once they arrive: worship that is alive, places to learn and grow with others, opportunities to serve and a culture of generosity. Equally, a church that excels at those four but neglects welcome tends to grow older and smaller, however healthy it feels from inside.

Questions for a leadership team

  1. When did each of us last bring someone new to worship or another activity? What made it easy or hard?
  2. Ask two people who started attending in the last year to describe their first visit. What did they notice that we no longer see?
  3. What happens, concretely, in the week after someone visits for the first time? Who is responsible?
  4. Which groups in our neighborhood are absent from our congregation? What would welcome look like from their point of view?
  5. What one habit could we change this season that would make welcome everyone's responsibility rather than a team's?

Sources and further reading