Notebook

Wesley's Covenant Prayer and the covenant renewal service: history and practice

Notebook · Published 2026-10-22

Oil portrait of John Wesley as an old man with long white hair, wearing black clerical dress with white bands
John Wesley, after a portrait by George Romney. Public domain.

Every January, in Methodist congregations around the world, worshippers pray a prayer that begins by giving themselves away entirely. The covenant renewal service is one of the most distinctive gifts of the Wesleyan tradition to Christian worship, and one of the most demanding. It fits naturally with the practices of passionate worship and intentional faith development, because it asks a congregation to say, together and out loud, what it means to belong to God.

Origins: Spitalfields, 1755

John Wesley drew the idea of a personal covenant with God from English Puritan writers, especially Joseph Alleine and his father-in-law Richard Alleine, whose devotional writings described a solemn act of self-dedication. Wesley adapted it for his Methodist societies. His journal records the first covenant service on 11 August 1755, held in the French church at Spitalfields in London, with about 1,800 people taking part. The service became a regular feature of Methodist life, usually held at the start of the year.

The words Wesley used in 1755 have not survived in full. In 1780 he published a pamphlet, Directions for Renewing Our Covenant with God, which is thought to reflect them and which became the basis for later services. In the twentieth century British Methodists revised the service substantially, and a shorter, modern form of the prayer became widely known. Versions of the service and prayer appear in the worship books of many Methodist churches, including The United Methodist Church in the United States, where the service is often paired with Charles Wesley's hymn "Come, Let Us Use the Grace Divine", number 606 in The United Methodist Hymnal.

The shape of the service

Covenant services vary, but most share a recognizable structure:

Congregations often print the service in a separate order of worship. Some invite worshippers to sign and date a card with the covenant words and keep it through the year, a practice that recalls the personal covenants of the Puritan writers Wesley admired.

The prayer, briefly

The best-known modern form of the Covenant Prayer begins with a declaration of belonging to God rather than to oneself, and then moves through a series of paired opposites. In paraphrase: the one praying offers to be put to work or set aside, to be honored or overlooked, to be filled or emptied, to have plenty or nothing, and gives everything to God's purposes. It ends by sealing the covenant on earth and asking that it be confirmed in heaven.

What makes the prayer startling is its refusal of the usual bargain. Most prayers ask for good outcomes. This one accepts in advance that faithfulness may bring suffering, obscurity or loss. It is not a prayer of resignation, however; it is a prayer of trust. Its pairs describe the ordinary ups and downs of a life of service, and place both sides in God's hands.

For congregations, three lines of reflection are especially fruitful. The first concerns usefulness: many committed members find it harder to accept being "laid aside" than to accept hard work, yet churches flourish when people can hand on roles gracefully. The second concerns suffering: following Christ brings people close to those who suffer, and that proximity costs something, which links the prayer to risk-taking mission and service. The third concerns possessions: "having nothing" is a startling thing to pray in a consumer culture, and connects the prayer to extravagant generosity.

Practical notes for congregations

Why it endures

The covenant service has survived more than two and a half centuries of liturgical change because it says something congregations need to hear and rarely say: that belonging to God reorders everything else. In an era of consumer religion, where churches can be chosen and left like any other service, a public act of self-giving is countercultural. It reminds a congregation that its practices are not techniques for institutional health but ways of responding to grace.

Sources and further reading